three or four people, in one of the biggest and most prestigious cancer centers in the world, so I'm going to say that's merely the law of statistical averages. Now, I looked on MSK's website, I searched for the word "Israel" to see if there was some Giant Nefarious Statement of Genocide Support they put on there, and all I can see is that they employ some highly accomplished doctors who happen to be Israeli Jews. Exterminated!" is a big old heap of undifferentiated, unexamined, and straight-up pile of nasty antisemitic stereotypes, then I'll have to question why, exactly, you're committed to not seeing that. ![]() Now, I try to be patient when explaining and teaching things, but if you can't see why "Jews are infiltrating the American/global healthcare system to kill innocent people and are doing genocide all over and this needs to be Confronted, i.e. It also ties into the conspiracy rhetoric echoed on social media that "Zionist" (read, Jewish) doctors are secretly killing Palestinian and/or non-Jewish patients. ![]() It gives the impression (correctly, one suspects) that this isn't about advocating for the Palestinian cause or Palestinian people in any constructive way it's about harassing healthcare workers and cancer patients in case they happen to be Jews. Indeed, the tagline "Confronting Zionism in Healthcare" is about as stupid as it is possible to be. literally nothing about that which suggests this (aside from the suggestion that Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in Manhattan, New York, is "not an innocent bystander to genocide," whatever the fuck that means). (Spoiler: it isn't).įirst and foremost: for an event marketing itself as "Pro-Palestine," there is. We have to remember that these things are not necessarily obvious or intuitive to everyone, and that when they either don't understand or aren't sure how to explain what they feel about it, they are therefore more likely to simply agree with what "feels" right, confirms pre-existing opinions, fits in with what everyone else is saying, and otherwise lose the ability to make important distinctions or even mount any kind of pushback or question as to whether this is helping at all. Okay, I've decided (possibly unwisely) that I am going to take some time and actually explain in-depth why these types of stunts are so stupid and harmful, rather than just remarking on it in passing. Only the fact that the administration didn’t comply with the Administrative Procedures Act and got sued, Trump lost reelection, and Biden rescinded the rule and worked to draft and implement a new one prevented the worse outcome. The Comptroller of the Currency under Trump unilaterally issued a rule change to the CRA that would have gutted the requirements for banks to serve low income neighborhoods and minority communities. It’s highlighting for me how one of the issues with Trump being reelected is not just the threat of him specifically but also the various underlings and appointees he would have and the specific damage they can inflict in their positions, and how he attracts the worst people who want to destroy so many different things. ![]() Part of that is including a history of the CRA and especially the Trump administration’s efforts to gut the CRA. One of the things I’m working on at work is a briefing about the Community Reinvestment Act and the recent changes by the Biden administration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |